Building bush fire protection and associated land-use planning has been regulated in Australia since 2002, and has led to the development of building and land-use planning codes andstandards that have inevitably saved lives and property. This has also been the driver for development of assessment techniques and innovative products to protect against bush fires.
Such regulation in Australia has also had a significant impact on housing affordability and associated ability to develop and build in areas that would previously/otherwise have beenconsidered suitable/economical but currently may not be (including low-risk suburban type community areas).
Such regulation has also seen complications in design, compliance, and approvals from a practical perspective due to conflicting constraints and requirements (e.g., clearing for asset protectionzones versus environmental constraints prohibiting the same to preserve vegetation), frequently resulting in substantial financial/approvals risk, uncertainties, and excessive assessment timeframes (often rendering sites undevelopable and/or resulting in costs that can be considered excessive).
There are also observed disconnects between our building and fire code reforms of the late 1990s that led to the adoption of, and commitment to, principles of performance-based designand compliance (e.g., the performance-based Building Code of Australia) and building bush fire protection and associated land-use planning requirements.
The evolution has seen bush fire regulation sitting mainly in the development approvals (i.e., planning approvals) space to maintain the highest degree of control over bush fire protection,while also leading to evaluation, assessment, and approvals approaches that could sometimes be considered overly rigid and restrictive.
This session explores the background, history, current state of play, and potential future directions of building bush fire protection and associated land-use planning regulation in Australia, aswell as relevant issues, from the author’s perspective and that of participants.